I am confused. Your pattern is general (no restrictions on labels of 'm', type of 'r', and no direction for 'r'), except for the FinanceManager node is specific. As such, any relationships from the FinanceManager should be included your results. The graph would imply you should get back five rows of data.
What do you get with this query when you replace with the correct FinanceManager idRef: 3 or 5?
match (n:FinanceManager{idRef:"replace with idRef"})-[r]-(m)
return count(r)
Also, what do you get back if you run the query after disabling "Connect result nodes" in the settings (gear icon)?
Under the Relationship types it show '5' in the first box. The count 3 comes when you count relationship types, as you have 3 different types. For two types you have 2 relationships of same type. The difference is count of relationships vs count of relationship types.
Interesting. That means those two relationships are not part of your query results, explaining the stats shown and the results returned. Now the question is why they are not part of your query results when there is no constraints in your pattern to eliminate them.
You have two "unknown" labels, attached to those two nods that have double relations (probably wrong insert query doubled with unknown label).
Also, you query don't ask for specific label, so all labels are returned and rendered. But result return nods, not labels and that's what you see in table result.